Skip to CRM content

121 CRM working template · Field-mapping worksheet

Field-mapping worksheet: structure the work before configuring it.

Define how each source value will reach the destination. This template provides a compact working structure, prompts for the information that matters and shows how Cedar Legal Admin might complete it. It is guidance, not proof of legal, commercial or operational sufficiency.

Customer Thread

Field-mapping worksheet at a glance

Illustrative example
  1. Source field

    State the fact or decision in plain English.

  2. Destination field

    Add enough evidence for another person to understand the record.

  3. Transformation rule

    Add enough evidence for another person to understand the record.

  4. Test and exception result

    Name who checks it and what happens next.

    Human decision

Fictional completed example for Cedar Legal Admin, a fictional professional-services team.

Fictional completed extract

See the field-mapping worksheet in use

The interface illustrates a working decision record, with ownership and review visible.

121 CRM · Control responsibilities
Control questionOwnerNext check
Who can export customer data?CustomerConfirm
Who changes workflow permissions?Agreed scopeRecord
What happens at account closure?SharedDefine
Which suppliers process data?SharedCheck
Illustrative exampleIllustrative governance pattern. It does not assert that a specific technical control or certification is in place.

Inside the working system

See what each part contributes.

The CRM is easier to plan when contacts, conversations, work, access and automation are treated as separate capabilities with clear responsibilities.

Capability 01

Import and export

Moves supported records through structured files, with mapping and validation needed before relying on the result.

How it works
Stores or organises supported business data under configured fields, permissions and record rules.
Why use it
Supports controlled migration and operational extracts when the data is prepared and reconciled.
Plan for
The platform does not make imported, duplicated or incomplete data accurate without review. Bulk migration requires mapping and reconciliation; do not treat a completed import as proof of accuracy or reversibility.
Your team owns
A data owner must define the record model and resolve quality, ownership and access exceptions.
Capability 02

Custom fields

Adds structured fields to supported record types so a business can capture information it actually needs.

How it works
Stores or organises supported business data under configured fields, permissions and record rules.
Why use it
Replaces important notes and spreadsheet columns with searchable, reusable data.
Plan for
The platform does not make imported, duplicated or incomplete data accurate without review.
Your team owns
A data owner must define the record model and resolve quality, ownership and access exceptions.
Capability 03

Contacts

Stores a person or lead with contact details, activity, ownership and related records.

How it works
Stores or organises supported business data under configured fields, permissions and record rules.
Why use it
Gives a team one place to understand who a customer is and what has happened.
Plan for
The platform does not make imported, duplicated or incomplete data accurate without review.
Your team owns
A data owner must define the record model and resolve quality, ownership and access exceptions.
Capability 04

Companies

Groups people and related information around an organisation rather than treating every person in isolation.

How it works
Stores or organises supported business data under configured fields, permissions and record rules.
Why use it
Helps business-to-business teams see contacts in the context of the company they work for.
Plan for
The platform does not make imported, duplicated or incomplete data accurate without review.
Your team owns
A data owner must define the record model and resolve quality, ownership and access exceptions.

How to use it

Complete the field-mapping worksheet in a short working session

Bring the people who understand the source work and the people who will own the result. Complete the first version with evidence to hand, then test it rather than polishing it in isolation.

Set a narrow scope

Name the process, team, data population and decision covered by this field-mapping worksheet. Create another record when the owner, purpose or risk is materially different.

Use observable wording

Write facts, rules and expected results that another person can inspect. Replace words such as “quick”, “complete” or “automatic” with a time, population, event or named responsibility.

Human review point

Record uncertainty

Mark missing evidence and unresolved decisions openly. Do not turn an unknown entitlement, data condition or approval into a positive answer simply to complete the sheet.

Fields to complete

The four parts of this field-mapping worksheet

The prompts are deliberately small. Add a field only when it changes configuration, testing, ownership or a later decision.

1. Source field

Describe source field for the exact scope being reviewed. Include the source of the information, the person responsible for keeping it current and the evidence that would show the entry is wrong or incomplete.

2. Destination field

Describe destination field for the exact scope being reviewed. Include the source of the information, the person responsible for keeping it current and the evidence that would show the entry is wrong or incomplete.

3. Transformation rule

Describe transformation rule for the exact scope being reviewed. Include the source of the information, the person responsible for keeping it current and the evidence that would show the entry is wrong or incomplete.

4. Test and exception result

Describe test and exception result for the exact scope being reviewed. Include the source of the information, the person responsible for keeping it current and the evidence that would show the entry is wrong or incomplete.

From record to action

Check the handover before approval

A second view shows how the recorded decision should connect to testing, exceptions and accountable human review.

121 CRM · Connected operations

Book discovery

October · illustrative availability

MTWTFSS1234567891011121314
11:3014:00

Appointment sequence

Booked

Calendar entry created

1 day before

Reminder scheduled

Exception

Owner reviews a reply

Journey summary

New

24

Illustrative

Owned

21

Illustrative

Due

4

Illustrative

Website
Referral
Direct
Illustrative exampleAll dates, counts and workflow states are fictional. Availability and behaviour depend on the agreed setup.

Fictional example

A completed extract for Cedar Legal Admin

Cedar Legal Admin uses the template for one bounded CRM change. The example is intentionally modest: it shows the quality of a useful entry without suggesting a universal answer.

Source field

The team wants one agreed record and owner for website enquiries received during working hours. Success means each valid enquiry has a source, owner and dated next action.

Destination field

Amina owns the working definition; Sam covers absence. The office team can edit the record, while managers can review exceptions and results.

Transformation rule

The team tests five ordinary examples plus a duplicate, an opt-out, missing information and an unassigned record. Every mismatch is logged for correction.

Test and exception result

A person reviews the result after two weeks. Activation or wider use proceeds only if the sample reconciles and staff can handle exceptions without a private workaround.

Review before use

Treat the template as a decision record, not a certificate

A completed worksheet helps people inspect their reasoning. It does not itself establish compliance, product availability or a successful implementation.

Check the evidence

Ask whether every important statement has an identifiable source and whether that source covers the current scope. Recheck vendor capability and account configuration separately.

Test the handover

Give the record to someone who did not write it. If they cannot explain the owner, rule, exception and next action, revise the wording before relying on it.

Set a review trigger

Review after a failed test, material process change, supplier change, new channel, altered responsibility or evidence that staff are bypassing the agreed method.

Questions about this page

Useful answers, without the sales fog.

1. Can we use this field-mapping worksheet without changing it?

Use the structure as a starting point, but adapt the scope, fields, evidence and approvals to the real process. Delete prompts that do not affect a decision and add only those you can maintain.

2. Is the field-mapping worksheet a legal or compliance template?

No. It is an operational planning aid. Obtain appropriate professional advice where the work involves legal, regulatory, contractual, clinical or other specialist obligations.

3. Does completing the field-mapping worksheet confirm a 121 CRM entitlement?

No. Product features and account availability must be checked against the live configuration and agreed commercial scope before implementation.

4. Who should approve the completed field-mapping worksheet?

The person accountable for the affected process should review it with the people responsible for data, configuration, customer communication and exception handling.

Read all CRM questions

Delegate the work. Keep the human.

Ready to organise the customer journey?

Subscribe through the approved secure checkout, or review pricing and responsibilities before you decide.

121 CRM

Your customers. Your conversations. Your business. Organised around clear ownership and human decisions.